|Casa||ugg cheap boots||ugg adirondack tall||ugg outlet online boots||Back|
|ugg adirondack tall
Shocking images from Channel IV Sri Lanka film Flies swarming over dead bodies of small children; a man screaming for help while carrying his badly wounded child ; a mother sitting besides her dying children and crying uncontrollably; makeshift hospitals swamped with wounded civililans; people trapped without food or medicine; and supposedly trophy videos of captured rebels, including the slain LTTE chief V Prabhakaran s 12 year old unarmed son Balakandran Prabhakaran allegedly by Sri Lankan forces. These are some of the shocking images from the controversial documentary, Sri Lanka s Killing Fields: War Crimes Unpunished, screened by Britain s Channel 4 on Wednesday amid protests from the Sri Lankan High Commission in London which described the claims made in it as and The most controversial part of the 50 minute film is the footage of Balakandran s bullet ridden body. It shows a 12 year old boy lying on the ground to the waist and with bullet holes in his chest. The film claims that he was executed by security forces. Besides him lie the bodies of five men believed to be his bodyguards. While Colombo has questioned its authenticity calling it Channel cheap ugg boots sale 4 insists that it is . Callum McCrae, producer and director of the film, told The Hindu that it had been examined and by a leading pathologist Professor Derrick Pounder. is murder. No doubt about it, Prof Pounder says. The footage dating from May 18, 2009 appeared to have been shot as a trophy video by Sri Lankan forces , according to Mr McCrae. The film quotes an unnamed Sri Lankan officer as saying in a sworn affidavit that Balachandran was before being shot. Mr McCrae said the Channel 4 had the document and found it to be genuine . The film purports to show video evidence of war crimes including contemporaneous documents, eye witness accounts, and stills relating to how exactly events unfolded during the final days of the 26 year old civil war that ended in May 2009. Through interviews and footage, the film claims that the responsibility for what happened points to the highest levels of the Sri Lankan government including President Rajapaska and his brother, the Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse It asks, did the world let it happen? and appeals to the United Nations and the international community to ensure that victims are not forgotten . The closing shot shows the dead bodies of two little children covered with flies. Keywords: Channel 4 video, LTTE, Sri Lankan Tamils, ethnic conflict, Eelam War, Prabakaran, Balachandran, Sri Lanka war crimes, human rights violation India gave away Katchaitheevu to Sri Lanka. THis was the most treacherous deed a country has done against its own people. No one can stop China setting up a Naval base in Katchaitheevu just 20km from Tamil Nadu coast. Posted on: Apr 5, 2012 at 15:46 IST Everybody seems to want to blame the Indian Government here. My question is what were the so called "dravidian" parties doing all along (while being partner in the central government)? Posted on: Mar 17, 2012 at 08:00 IST One has to make a start some where. Everyone agrees that something was done in a wrong way. People saying every thing was right are just going by primitive spirits. It looks very obvious from all the news items one can read on the internet that the Sri Lankan army did do things in a wrong way. There are lessons which neighbouring countries too have to learn. India and many other countries just looked away because it was not their problem. Still ignoring things now and hoping time will just fade memories is the wrong way out. Everyone would agree that no person should suffer this misery again. So if you don t look back, analyse, verify and rectify; what is the reassurance that this will not happen to where can i buy ugg boots on sale some other civilian population in the world. You cannot wait for a perfect nation or a perfect person to raise this issue as this might not happen at all. I don t think any one in nature can become perfect, but as humans we need to create society to aspire for perfection and to be just. Posted on: Mar 17, 2012 at 05:29 IST After having acquitted Narindera Modi, Indians don t have a moral leg to stand on. All violence ugg boots gold coast is deplorable, but frankly, how has India treated it s secessionists. What has happened in Sri Lanka that did not happen in Kashmir, Gujarat, Assam, Punjab, Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq?
ugg adirondack tall
shoddy bank practices hurt homeowners Knoxville News Sentinel Chanel Rosario was supposed to be one of the lucky ones. After years of sending and re sending documents, waiting on hold and attending court hearings to avoid foreclosure on her Staten Island home, she d finally received a much needed reduction on her mortgage. Eagerly, she and her ugg shoes kids husband signed it and mailed it in last September. "We thought it was over." It wasn t. After months of making payments, Rosario called the bank handling her mortgage, Chase Home Finance, and found out Chase was still reporting her as delinquent, damaging her credit score and putting her home in jeopardy. Despite months of trying to get an explanation with the help of a legal aid attorney, she still doesn t know why Chase isn t abiding by the agreement. It s a disturbingly common occurrence, say consumer advocates: Many homeowners have been granted a hard fought mortgage modification only official ugg website to have their mortgage company effectively pull a bait and switch. The problems range from homeowners being hit with unexpected extra charges to the bank simply ignoring the signed agreement. Handling these types of cases "seems to be our specialty these days," said Noah Zinner, an attorney with the nonprofit Housing and Economic Rights Advocates in Oakland, Calif. In addition to the prospect of losing their homes, homeowners can also see their access to other credit cut or have their interest rates on their credit cards jump as a result of being reported delinquent. To get a sense of how common this problem is, the nonprofit Connecticut Fair Housing Center conducted an informal survey of 16 legal aid organizations and one private attorney. In nearly a quarter of the 655 cases of modifications they reviewed, the mortgage servicer didn t abide by the terms of the agreement. In the worst cases, homeowners who thought they d successfully run the gauntlet of servicer errors and delays found themselves once again facing foreclosure. Sometimes the house was actually foreclosed on. "It s not just one servicer screwing up," said Andrew Neuhauser, an attorney with Advocates for Basic Legal Equality of Toledo, Ohio. "It s industry wide practice." ProPublica investigated six cases in which banks and other mortgage servicers offered modifications they didn t abide by. In some cases, like Rosario s, the bank was accepting new lower payments but seemed to have no record of the agreement. In another, accounting mistakes resulted in a buildup of arrears and late fees. One homeowner was hit with a bill for more than twice the agreed upon payment three months into a modification. Another received a foreclosure notice out of the blue. You can see our rundown of these cases and the servicer responses here. In general, the servicers contacted by ProPublica either corrected the problems or said they d work to do so. None responded to a question about what steps the company was taking to prevent these sorts of problems. Attorneys interviewed by ProPublica said that they were usually successful in getting servicers to correct the problem but that it often took the threat of litigation. "It certainly seems that when the servicers have to, they ll fix it," said Zinner, the legal aid lawyer from Oakland. That may work for those who can afford lawyers or find free legal help, but most homeowners don t have legal representation. The frequent errors are par for the course for mortgage servicers, the companies that collect payments from homeowners and handle modifications and foreclosures. From widespread forgery to "robo signing" to mistaken foreclosures, the failures have stemmed from the industry s choice to devote inadequate resources to handling troubled loans. Those issues, it turns out, can continue to affect borrowers even after a modification has been signed. All this has happened on the watch of federal banking regulators, who only launched an investigation of the servicers practices when they became front page news. Bryan Hubbard, a spokesman for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the primary regulator for the country s biggest banks, said regulators were aware of the problems and are putting processes in place to address them. The banks, for instance, will soon be required to provide a "single point of contact" for each homeowner, so that when an error does occur, the homeowner will supposedly be able reach someone knowledgeable about their case. The homeowners interviewed by ProPublica often complained of being unable to get an explanation for why their servicer wasn t following the signed contract. One had even complained to the OCC without any results. Inevitably, they found themselves passed from one servicer employee to another, none of whom seemed to understand the situation. "What they did was put blame on me, burden guy ugg boots on me to get this straight when they already knew what the mistake was," said Carolyn Chaney of Seattle, Wash., after battling with Bank of America. As we ve noted, advocates have criticized regulators like the OCC for their poor track record in identifying servicer abuses and are skeptical that the new regulations will substantially improve the experience for homeowners. In April, regulators ordered 14 of the country s largest banks to make a variety of changes to their servicing operations and to review their foreclosure actions over the past couple years. Servicers violating modification agreements is "among the kinds of issues that the enforcement actions are intended to address and that the foreclosure look back review will help quantify," the OCC s Hubbard said. Under the foreclosure review, homeowners could be reimbursed for "impermissible or excessive penalties, fees, or expenses, or other financial injury suffered," he said, including somehow compensating the homeowner if there was an improper sale of the house. As we ve reported, many details of the reviews remain uncertain, including how much banks will be compensating wronged homeowners. "The biggest factor in determining an appropriate remedy is to determine the actual financial harm suffered by the homeowners as a result of an improper foreclosure action," said Hubbard. Homeowners seeking redress often face an additional hurdle due to the servicer not returning their signed copy of the agreement, said Jeff Gentes of the Connecticut Fair Housing Center. "You re arguing uphill," he said, if you don t have conclusive proof that the servicer agreed.