mens nike free run nike free 3.0 v2 cheap nike free Back
nike free 3.0 v2

60 Minutes except on the West Coast I ve just been watching the Chargers Raiders game. Here in Denmark we get the pictures from CBS dubbed with Danish commentary. Around the end of the game a graphic on screen read "Coming up: 60 Minutes (except on the West Coast)". I ve noticed this before and it strikes me as odd, especially since the game was between Oakland and San Diego and I would imagine there were more viewers on the West Coast than on the East Coast. Why do they do this? What s coming up on the West Coast? posted by sveskemus to sports, hobbies, recreation (11 answers total) nike air max torch 4 60 Minutes airs at 7 PM on the east coast and on the west coast. The football game ends after 7 pm EDT but before 7 PM PDT, so in the Pacific Time Zone they will go to local news or other filler until 60 Minutes airs at its regular time. posted by Saucy Intruder at 5:18 PM on October 16, 2005 The West Coast usually gets a bum deal on scheduling, since most TV scheduled are devised black nike free run for Eastern. As a non native who lived in LA for a while, most of this confused me to the extreme. posted by wackybrit at 5:18 PM on October 16, 2005 Part of the reason for this is that scheduling is not only focused on the East coast, the time differences can cause issues. Mountain and Central time zones are far less populous, and relatively close in time difference. However, three hours is enough to completely skew what is "Prime Time", so West coast TV is scheduled to be at the same relative time as East coast TV, not simultaneous broadcast. Some things, such as sports, are aired live regardless of timing. So, oddities like this can pop up, which is confusing for pretty much anyone outside of the US, and often anyone outside of the Pacific time zone. posted by Saydur at 5:40 PM on October 16, 2005 Generally after the afternoon football game, the station will air infomercials, some other syndicated show, and eventually the local news followed by the standard primetime network programming. Sometimes the station carrying the game will also have a post game show, shot live at a local bar or restaurant with the local TV news sports guy and someone who used to play for the team as a color guy. Speaking subjectively, the period between the end of the football game and the beginning of the primetime schedule is a hellish no man s land on the channel that carried the game, so we usually flip over to ESPN to watch NFL Primetime (obviously inappropriately named for us West Coasters, coming on at 4:30pm), followed by the Sunday night game. posted by LionIndex at 5:46 PM on October 16, 2005 I should also mention that in the case of football, there are only two starting times air max ltd 2 for all games, not counting the night game or Monday night. So, on the East Coast, a bunch of games start at 1pm ET (generally those played in the eastern part of the country) with more games at 4pm ET (generally the western games). On the West Coast, it s just shifted earlier 3 hours, but it seems that local games are pretty universally scheduled for around 1pm. At least for the coasts. posted by LionIndex at 5:53 PM on October 16, 2005 Also, prime time nike free 3.0 womens on the east coast is 8 11, in the central time zone, it s 7 10, so actually prime time is at the SAME time in those two zones. So, if a game ends just before prime time in the east and central, west coasters have to wait 3 hours for prime time. (I don t know what happens in the mountain zone do people even live there? ;) posted by clh at 7:38 PM on October 16, 2005 "Late Night nike running free 5.0 with Conan O Brien" each year broadcasts Happy New Year for the Central Time Zone, sent out an hour after the ball drops in Times Square. posted by gimonca at 9:31 PM on October 16, 2005 Here s the Straight Dope s take on the US time zone/ delayed broadcast issue. They do the same thing for the Emmys and the Oscars even though the show is broadcast from LA, because about half the country s population live in the Eastern time zone, they get it live, and we West Coasters have to live with the tape delay. posted by Guy Smiley at 9:59 PM on October 16, 2005 Wow. That s really confusing. But I guess it s pretty hard to schedule tv for people in different time zones in a way that makes 100 % sense to everybody.

nike free 3.0 v2

60 Minutes on Eyewear and Luxottica xpost FP I spent a lot of time working in this industry as a management consultant, doing work on everything from marketing to operations to manufacturing, and can say this piece is very much a hit job that misses the point. I said it nike air max 90 white in many threads here, too. There are some very big issues. The one that irks me the most is when she demands an answer to why, if they own the entire vertical, the products aren cheaper in their own stores. Are iPads cheaper in the Apple store? No, because then no one would buy one from Best Buy, and Best Buy would sue them for being anti competitive. It a question naive to the point of stupidity, but Stahl asks it in a way that gets people to believe it fair. Luxottica doesn dominate the eyewear industry, they dominate the luxury eyewear industry. There are significantly more cheap Walmart sunglasses sold than Luxottica could ever hope to. Luxottica only plays in the over $50 area, and, even then really more the over $100 area. And their overall margins aren as good as people make it out to be. They had something along the lines of $900MM in operating income on $7.4B in net sales. That good, but not incredible. The bottom line, though, is that this is a fashion company. Luxury fashion, in most cases. That depends on cost and a feeling of exclusivity. You can buy a Chanel bag in Walmart hell, if you don live near a major city you likely dozens, or hundreds, of miles from where you can buy a Chanel bag. So why should Chanel sunglasses be different? Chanel doesn think it should be, so Chanel won license out to anyone not maintaining their brand prices and exclusivity. There good reason for this, even with RayBan. RayBan was owned by B for years, and B brand team stopped really caring about exclusivity. They started overproducing and dumping. In the late 80s you could find RayBans extremely cheap in gas station convenience stores across America. They became what people nerdy uncle wore because he accidentally sat on his pair of Foster Grants and these were the same price at the same store. So people stopped wearing RayBans. For the first time in their history they became uncool, and in the 90s they were the butt of jokes (along with Member Only jackets.) Wearing RayBans was like wearing bootcut jeans or super tall spiked hair would be today it was a sign you were a decade or more behind the times. The brand plummeted, and B sold it to Luxottica. Luxottica took all the original machinery and moved it to Italy. They basically pulled it off the shelves in this time. They made it scarce. Then they came back at higher prices with "Made in Italy" stamped on it. It surged again. Coincidence? Not according to basic fashion rules. Brands need some semblance of unattainability to be popular. I can really think of any industry where the cheapest is the most liked. In any case, I probably still under NDA on cost structure, but just know that a pair of lenses in your RayBans cost more to make than the entire selling price of those sunglasses you can buy at the gas station down the street. They more likely to have UV protection, as no one checks cheap sunglasses and some are sneaking in with stickers and no protection, and that UV protection will last, because some cheap sunglasses just have a cheap UV protecting coating that will rub off when you clean them on your shirt. The lenses will be more clear, too, as cheap sunglasses tend to be mirky. Your RayBans will also have hydrophobic coating and backside anti reflective coating. The frame designs, particularly on the aviators, could be better in many cases, but Luxottica is preserving the original designs. Yeah, your 3025s feel flimsy, but it a classic design that they aren messing with. None of this means you need to buy $150 sunglasses for something decent. But, by and large, you really do need to spend $50ish. I remember taking samples of some expensive glasses back from one of the manufacturing facilities and giving them to a few female friends that only wore $15 or under sunglasses. They flipped out over how much more clearly they could see, and these were sunglasses used for a demonstration and were filthy with fingerprints. There a definite difference, but also a point of diminishing returns. Honestly, I think it worthwhile to save up and go for Persol if you can. I believe some people here have found reputable eBay sellers that have them for $120 $150. Everything about Persol will be better. I like Oliver Peoples, too, which Luxottica technically owns but hadn been terribly involved with (Oakley bought OP, Lux bought Oakley, Oakley runs OP) but Persol is absolutely a better product. Persol was perfectly positioned for the RayBan overflow. Around 2010 or 2011 RayBan really hit critical mass in NYC, where every single person on a sunny day in Manhattan had a pair. Persol became the exclusive, then. If you lived in Manhattan, you wanted to be seen in RayBans, but if you wanted to seem just a bit cooler, and more important, you had Persols. It douchey, sure, but walk down to Wall Street and look at anyone under 35 they in Persols. There are enormously underpenetrated areas, most specifically Asia (not Australia) and South America. Expect Brazil to be their second or third biggest country in a few years, same for most luxury brands. And while $900MM isn anything to sneeze at, it isn indicative nike air max bw of the monopoly with 600% markup for pure profit that some claim. Their stock won move huge amounts because it largely family owned, though. And most of their competitors are in other areas, too. Marchon is owned by VSP, who bought them to offer more complete insurance services to doctors (kind of the opposite of how Lux bought EyeMed to sell more frames.) Saffilo is tiny, I believe lesser quality, and always makes bad decisions (buying Solstice to compete with SGH then basically doing nothing with it other than rot.) Marcolin makes predominantly garbage and then Tom Ford. The best way to get around Lux is to buy from a small, handmade company. All the others are obsessed with cutting costs, a smaller company isn And, incidentally, Luxottica isn They are pretty content sinking money into production, knowing that their vertical lets them make it up elsewhere. The Italian production is pretty intense. Oakley as well. Yeah, I known about Luxottica for a while and I agree with you on this point of contention (along with a few others). While judgeholden72 did a decent job of explaining things, it really feels like PR for Luxottica (and Persol in specific). Lenses do not cost as much to make as they claim. His post is disputed by what was in the news report alone when they mentioned that the sales are for up to 20x the amount of the cost to produce. The CEO of that company had the smoothness of a mafia don. Seriously, watching him was laughable. Admittedly most CEO would try to say the same thing in defense of their company (rightly or wrongly) but the way he did it was just smooth. They bought out Oakley, they didn merge. They have a straight up monopoly on the market but because they an Italian company and nobody cares enough, nothing will be done about it. I just surprised at how many people are siding with the guy just because he did a half (yes, half, it wasn that good) job of trying to explain things after claiming to be a consultant. In regards to the Apple comparison, no, doesn work. Apple products do have competition and they do lower the prices of models over time. The same pair of Oakley Juliet have gone up over 100.00usd nike free 4.0 v2 from what they used to be years ago. Why? Cause you don have any choice, that why. OK, let toss the tech analogy out the window for the sake of argument and go with strictly fashion. There are still many makers of watches and you can get all kinds for prices that range from low to high. Therefore when you buy different brands, there are over a dozen different movement makers. Because of that, the competition is truly there not only because of name brand but because of a (potential at least) difference in quality. A Rolex is literally an entirely different watch from a Breitling, they not the same thing with two different brand names stamped on them and a design tweak. So if Rolex don perform well, eventually their brand name will become less valuable and the price will drop. In the case of Oakley Ray Ban etc they all made by the same company using the same techniques and the same workers. There no difference aside from design. That would be fine if they didn jack up the prices on all of their nike free 3.0 pink lines to make it seem as if some (prestige pricing, right?) were more valuable than others. Thus there no actual competition in the marketplace, it faked. When you control the market, the prices are no longer set by supply/demand, they set by the producer. Now sure, people could just stop buying them entirely but they can no longer buy alternatives (aside from extremely cheaply made sunglasses, but then that not really the same thing). So in order to buy a decent pair of sunglasses, you going to end up buying them from that one company. Monopoly. It an actual word, with a definition and most of society has pretty much agreed it a bad thing. You can argue for it all you want but the question isn whether a monopoly is good or bad, right now it only if Luxottica has gotten to that point or not. I say it has and you free to say it hasn Good question. I was speaking mostly about sunglasses. Lux obviously has more of a stranglehold over the US optical system, but even then, just the big retail chains. nike free clearance Your insurance is probably VSP, which won work with their retail. But the lenses are a medical device. The frames are a fashion product. The extent of how "medical" they are is very much a US thing, as well, due to the power of the AOA. Go to almost any other country and a doctor is not involved in the process (British Columbia is either the only Canadian province that does or does not, I can remember.) In most of the world you walk into an optical shop, have your prescription quickly taken, and that it. The pair I got in China was done by a very, very meticulous girl probably making $0.25 an hour, but man was she thorough. And even in the US, many of the online companies don really require a doctor. Zenni has no prescription verification process, which isn really legal, but they aren really a US company. Most of the ones doing all the labor overseas will let you put anything in your order and happily ship it to you.

nike free 3.0 v2

60s customs not so much Pan Am, ABC s new airline drama, is worth watching if only to see stylish stewardesses clad in regulation cool blue uniforms, embroidered bags, and wrist length white gloves. And so far, our fearless heroine, Kate, played by Kelli Garner, is the chicest of all. Her civilian wardrobe includes a bevy of to die for midi length pencil skirts, fitted short sleeved cardigans, and nude pumps. But while the fashionista in me enjoys the sartorially stunning slice of history series like Pan Am, Boardwalk Empire, and of course the doyenne of the genre, AMC s Mad Men, I can t help but think: The clothes of the era were sharp, but it sure was a crappy time for women not to mention minorities who lacked basic civil rights, earning potential, and sexual freedom. These looks, classy as they may have been, were styled around the restrictions of the day, and there were many. Nude hose were a must, as women were not "ladies" without them. Pants were largely a no no, too. Bras were pointy and tight. Girdles, a far cry from the malleable shapewear of today, were downright painful. And girdles were required. For example, during Sunday night s Pan Am episode, Christina Ricci s character, Maggie, reminded a colleague that an attendant caught without her girdle would be fired. "These shows represent the romantic narrative of the past," said Alphonso McClendon, an assistant professor of fashion design at Drexel University, who is studying the role fashion played in the Harlem Renaissance. "While the clothes are beautiful, they don t tell the complete story, especially when it comes to African Americans, civil rights, and the struggle for women in the corporate world," he said. The shows and our current fashion mood stem from what many refer to as the turn of the millennium casual nightmare that made it socially acceptable to nike free v5 wear jeans to upscale restaurants and to bare our midriffs, well, everywhere. And then there is my pet peeve, how modern day reality franchises like the Housewives, whether Basketball or Real, have taken once classy and established labels and made them look, well, cheap. I m thinking specifically of Herve Leger s banded dress, a favorite look of the tawdry housewives. Its image has been ruined. Our longing for all things retro has led Banana Republic to roll out a Mad Men inspired ready to wear women s collection for the second year in a row. Fall is full of belted shifts that take their inspiration from the 1960s, and the colored skinny pants of the 1970s. The just ended spring 2012 runway shows were a burst of color: Silhouettes of top designers from Karl Lagerfeld s Chanel to America s Tracy Reese mixed in looks from decades ago. McClendon says the turn to these looks is proof that we, the fashion public, long for air max outlet simpler times. Back before the 1940s, he said, the runways dictated what women wore. There was a specific fashion cycle and people weren t confused. "Fashion was structured and everyone including African Americans and Latinos wore the same thing in social settings," McClendon said. "Skirts had to be a certain length, pant lengths were consistent on every man. But people forget life was structured back then, too." This makes nike free 4.0 me think of the cinematically beautiful movie The Help. Costume designer Sharen Davis did a superb job dressing Aibileen, played by Viola Davis, in smart frocks in particular a burgundy long sleeved shift with a deep V in the back. But as an African American woman, I m sure glad I m not relegated to domestic work. Ane Crabtree, costume designer for Pan Am, has a similar philosophy. On one hand, Crabtree, a former stylist nike womens free run for Elle magazine, loves searching vintage costume houses for appropriate dresses, like the satiny forest green Dolce Gabbana shift Garner s character will wear in Sunday night s episode. But this biracial woman (her father is white, her mother Asian) cringes at the restrictions of the time. "I m conflicted," Crabtree said. "These pieces do represent a time when our world was completely different and not necessarily better." The upside is nike free 5.0 v3 that the story lines in these shows, especially Pan Am, were happening on the cusp of change. Pan Am is set in 1963, as the space race and the civil rights movement marched on. The 1970s, the era when women would symbolically give up bras and pantyhose, were not far off. "Fashionably speaking, we are now a better version of 1963," Crabtree said. "People appreciate fashion, but at the same time they are free to make the choices that are best for their lives, not the restricted society we live in."

nike free 3.0 v2

64th birthday ideas September 26, 2006 2:15 PM Subscribe I have a friend who is turning 64 this week, and I would like to get her 64 "units" of something, but I am kind of at a loss as to the "what" of it. not chocolates or flowers. I have thought of several ideas, but each is either flawed somehow ( fruit for example: it would be too much quantity wise and would likely go bad before nike free run 4 she could eat it) or impossible to mail, which is the other criteria: it must be deliverable by either mail or courier by Friday. Any cool suggestions? posted by frizelli to grab bag (26 answers total) 2 users marked this as a favorite How about a set of CDs with 64 air max 90 songs from the 50 s and 60 s, from when she was growing up? Or a little photo book (Flickr, Shutterfly or iphoto) air max 90 black with 64 favorite photos of memories you have together. Or a gift certificate for $64 somewhere. all red air max (might cost more than $50). Dimes were still real silver then, as were quarters. posted by dbmcd at 2:23 PM on September nike free 6.0 26, 2006 A poster with pictures of 64 things (butterflies, beers, chili peppers, dogs etc)? I ve seen a lot of posters like this, just need to find one that has the right number. 64 socks? You could try to get all kinds, some crazy interesting patterns, some warm ones for winter, some tall stockings, etc.

nike free 3.0 v2

650k worth of fake goods seized at Knoxville malls Knoxville News Sentinel As a result of the investigation, at least 10 shops in the malls will presumably be a little short of inventory when Black Friday rolls around.The names of the businesses have yet to be made public, but police say they seized fake handbags, jewelry, sunglasses, and designer cell phone cases when they executed search warrants at the ten mall retail outlets last Thursday."Counterfeit air max 1 sale copies of purses made by Coach, Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Dooney Bourke, Prada, and Gucci were recovered in several businesses," according to Knoxville Police Department spokesman Darrell DeBusk."Imitations of Prada, Christian Dior, and Chanel sunglasses were also seized," DeBusk said. "Fake jewelry items confiscated included knock offs of Tiffany Co. ear rings, necklaces, and bracelets. Multiple fake Rolex watches were also discovered during the operation."The value of the fake goodies was reckoned at $655,427, he said.The targeted retailers included two stores and eight kiosks, he said."It is a lot, but not uncommon with what you see across the country," he said.KPD Chief Sterling P. Owen IV said the operation was launched to protect unwary consumers."This operation was extremely successful," he said. "The confiscation of these counterfeit air max kids items will help prevent the public from being victimized while they conduct their Christmas shopping."The investigation was headed by KPD s Organized Crime Unit, DeBusk said. He declined to go into specifics about the investigation.When asked if the pending holiday season prompted the seizures, DeBusk replied: "It did not drive the investigation, but obviously we were concerned with that much merchandise being out and the citizens that could be taken advantage of when they start their Christmas shopping."The District Attorney General s Office is reviewing the case along with investigators to determine who might face criminal charges, he said. Any charges will likely be filed through a Knox nike free run 4.0 County grand jury.Police say they are planning more counterfeit merchandise operations "for the near future."More details as they develop online and in Thursday s News Sentinel.I ve never understood the knock off trade anyway. I know there are lots of legitimate brands that use similar logos and designs of higher up brands like Coach or Dooney and Burke using the general design, color pattern or logo placement of the higher up Gucci, Louis Vuitton, or Chanel and then Liz Claiborne or Tommy Hilfiger making a cheaper version of the Coach etc. so that all buyers get a great looking legitimate handbag to fit their budget. I mean you won t fool anyone who does buy the real stuff and even I can tell from across the nike free 1.0 room or Walmart parking lot that odds are you aren t complimenting your otherwise discount store attire with a $1000 or better handbag. The only thing I can say in defense of the local mall kiosk vendors is that I ve never had one stop me and try to pass something off as the real thing here and I don t think anyone believes they are buying the real thing anyway but just in case they always have signs saying they are imitation, faux, "inspired by" or some other small disclaimer that I m sure they don t freely point out. Anyway, I would be glad to see them go from any and all shops selling a fake of any brand no matter the price level.And about those fake purses when I was in West Town the other night, I saw several of those purses selling for about $39.99 and I knew immediately that they were fake, but I was surprised at how much the knock offs have come down in price.A few years ago, I attended a purse party held at someone s home, and the Louis Vuitton and Burberry bags were selling for at least $100 each, which is pretty steep for any purse in my opinion, but if the real deal equivelent is $800 and you care about brands that much, I guess a knock off Vuitton is okay. However, I noticed that the stitch work on the knock off bags was sloppy, the zippers were cheap and there was an obvious flaw in the leather and construction of the purses (they were made with real leather though.)I guess the mall stores were cutting into the purse party business, perhaps. I seriously doubt however that consumer protection was the real motivation behind this sting operation/crackdown. Since when are consumers ever the major concern in any business operation? Profit is the main concern and businesses can pretty much wrap a turd up in pretty paper and market it and sell it and there s always someone willing to try it out and pay for it. "Buyer beware" is the law of the land.And, as someone already mentioned, consumers know they re not buying real Louis Vuitton (well, the majority do and you ll always have one or two dumbarses in the bunch).And about those fake purses when I was in West Town the other night, I saw several of those purses selling for about $39.99 and I knew immediately that they were fake, but I was surprised at how much the knock offs have come down in price.A few years ago, I attended a purse party air max premium held at someone s home, and the Louis Vuitton and Burberry bags were selling for at least $100 each, which is pretty steep for any purse in my opinion, but if the real deal equivelent is $800 and you care about brands that much, I guess a knock off Vuitton is okay. However, I noticed that the stitch work on the knock off bags was sloppy, the zippers were cheap and there was an obvious flaw in the leather and construction of the purses (they were made with real leather though.)I guess the mall stores were cutting into the purse party business, perhaps. I seriously doubt however that consumer protection was the real motivation behind this sting operation/crackdown. Since when are consumers ever the major concern in any business operation? Profit is the main concern and businesses can pretty much wrap a turd up in pretty paper and market it and sell it and there s always someone willing to try it out and pay for it. "Buyer beware" is the law of the land.And, as someone already mentioned, consumers know they re not buying real Louis Vuitton (well, the majority do and you ll always have one or two dumbarses in the bunch).And about those fake purses when I was in West Town the other night, I saw several of those purses selling for about $39.99 and I knew immediately that they were fake, but I was surprised at how much the knock offs have come down in price.A few years ago, I attended a purse party held at someone s home, and the Louis Vuitton and Burberry bags were selling for at least $100 each, which is pretty steep for any purse in my opinion, but if the real deal equivelent is $800 and you care about brands that much, I guess a knock off Vuitton is okay. However, I noticed that the stitch work on the knock off bags was sloppy, the zippers were cheap and there was an obvious flaw in the leather and construction of the purses (they were made with real leather though.)I guess the mall stores were cutting into the purse party business, perhaps. I seriously doubt however that consumer protection was the real motivation behind this sting operation/crackdown. Since when are consumers ever the major concern in any business operation? Profit is the main concern and businesses can pretty much wrap a turd up in pretty paper and market it and sell it and there s always someone willing to try it out and pay for it. "Buyer beware" is the law of the land.And, as someone already mentioned, consumers know they re not buying real Louis Vuitton (well, the majority do and you ll always have one or two dumbarses in the bunch).

nike free 3.0 v2